“Proof that we trapped antihydrogen rests on establishing that our signal is not due to a background,” says Fajans. (The violet star is an energetic positron.) (Click on image for best resolution.) Charged bare antiprotons would be steered to different clusters by different electric fields (red right bias, blue left bias, green no bias), but anti-atoms are neutral so their distribution is unaffected. The positions of the 38 real anti-atom annihilations (circles and triangles) match predicted antihydrogen distribution (gray dots in upper panel) but not the simulated distribution of bare antiprotons (colored dots in lower panel). In this way the researchers recorded 38 antihydrogen atoms, which had been held in the trap for almost two-tenths of a second. As soon as the trap’s magnet was “quenched,” any trapped anti-atoms were released, and their subsequent annihilation was recorded by silicon detectors. To form antihydrogen during these sessions, antiprotons were mixed with positrons inside the trap. The trials were repeated at intervals never shorter than 15 minutes. In a forthcoming issue of Nature now online, the ALPHA team reports the results of 335 experimental trials, each lasting one second, during which the anti-atoms were created and stored. ALPHA team member Jonathan Wurtele of AFRD, also a professor of physics at UC Berkeley, led a team of Berkeley Lab staff members and visiting scientists who used computer simulations to verify the advantages of the octupole trap. Fajans and his colleagues in AFRD and at UC proposed, designed, and tested the octupole magnet, which was fabricated at Brookhaven. The main component is an octupole (eight-magnetic-pole) magnet whose fields keep anti-atoms away from the walls of the trap and thus prevent them from annihilating. The ALPHA collaboration succeeded by using a specially designed magnetic bottle called a Minimum Magnetic Field Trap. ![]() “ALPHA routinely makes thousands of antihydrogen atoms in a single second, but most are too ‘hot’”-too energetic-“to be held in the trap. “Trapping antihydrogen proved to be much more difficult than creating antihydrogen,” says ALPHA team member Joel Fajans, a scientist in Berkeley Lab’s Accelerator and Fusion Research Division (AFRD) and a professor of physics at UC Berkeley. Although they made antimatter they couldn’t store it, because the anti-atoms touched the ordinary-matter walls of the experiments within millionths of a second after forming and were instantly annihilated-completely destroyed by conversion to energy and other particles. Large quantities of antihydrogen atoms were first made at CERN eight years ago by two other teams. Underground Neutrino Experiment Could Provide Greater Clarity on Matter-Antimatter Imbalance.CUORE Underground Experiment Narrows the Search for Rare Particle Process.The Mystery of the Star That Wouldn’t Die.View more articles relating to antimatter: Measurements of anti-atoms may reveal how the physics of antimatter differs from that of the ordinary matter that dominates the world we know today. While the number of trapped anti-atoms is far too small to fuel the Starship Enterprise’s matter-antimatter reactor, this advance brings closer the day when scientists will be able to make precision tests of the fundamental symmetries of nature. ![]() Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and the University of California at Berkeley have made key contributions to the ongoing international effort.ĪLPHA stored atoms of antihydrogen, consisting of a single negatively charged antiproton orbited by a single positively charged anti-electron (positron). (Graphic by Katie Bertsche) (Click on image for best resolution.)Ītoms of antimatter have been trapped and stored for the first time by the ALPHA collaboration, an international team of scientists working at CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research near Geneva, Switzerland. An artist’s impression of an antihydrogen atom – a negatively charged antiproton orbited by a positively charge anti-electron, or positron – trapped by magnetic fields.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |